beta
(영문) 부산고등법원 2021.01.28 2020나53647

부당이득금

Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

The first instance judgment is the purport of the claim and the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning for the judgment of the first instance, except for the cases cited or added in the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance as set forth in paragraph 2 below, and therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Part 4 of the first instance court's decision that is written or added shall not be "(s)" as "not "(s)", and "interest and interest" in the 14th instance judgment shall be used as "proceeds (5% to 30%)", and "the defendant in the 4th instance judgment" shall be replaced as "the plaintiff", and "in the appellate court" as "in the appellate court on November 20, 2019", respectively.

A. The first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s 5 pages 12 “Consideration 12” was used, and the first instance court’s 13th instance court’s 2th instance court’s 13th instance court’s 2th instance court’s 2th instance court’s 3th instance court’s 3th instance court’s 3th instance court judgment

A. More than anything else, I think that there is no objective evidence to verify the fact that a monetary consumption lending contract has been concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant following the third conduct under the third conduct of the first instance judgment.

3. The decision of the first instance court is legitimate, so the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.