beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.04.12 2017고단5303

사기

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 28, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime such as fraud at Seoul Southern District Court, and on April 26, 2012, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced four months of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court, and completed the execution of each of the above punishment on September 16, 2013.

The defendant of "2017 Highest 5303" is the victim's last inspection at the "M Ka Center" center of the victim's L in order to operate the victim's L, which is located in Y in Ma-si of the Government of Ma-si on August 2016.

It shall be sold in the amount of 8 million won.

“.....”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to purchase the vehicle even if he received the vehicle price from the injured party.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; and (b) transferred the sum of KRW 4,250,000,000 to the P deposit account in the name of the Defendant, including KRW 2.1 million on September 13, 2016; (c) KRW 26,00,000 on September 26, 2016; and (d) KRW 150,000 on October 7, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

"2018 Highest 384"

1. On March 11, 2015, the Defendant, at the coffee shop located in Q Q Q Q, committed as if he/she performed the management of his/her claim, to the victim and to take measures so that he/she may investigate the debtor of the party and receive money.

From March 25, 2015, deposit amounting to KRW 1,500,000, and KRW 20,110,000 for the claim amounting to KRW 100,00,000 will take place.

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, the Defendant was dissolved to the existing mortgage management company, and the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to collect the claim on behalf of the victim even if he received the money from the victim because of economic difficulties, such as the Defendant’s dissolution of the existing mortgage management company and default on the rent of KRW 20,000,000, and there was a debt equivalent to KRW 90,000,00,000.

The defendant deceivings the victim and is under his control.