현주건조물방화미수등
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On June 18, 2020, the Defendant is a customer who visited a restaurant with the trade name “C” located in Gyeonggi-gun B around June 2020, and the victim D ( South and 58 years old) is a person who operates the restaurant.
1. A special assault Defendant visited the above restaurant at the same time, visited the above restaurant at the same time, 2 persons, 1 week, and 21:10 on the same day, and 21:10 on the same day, heard the victim’s words “after the end of her business, but her delivery.”
The Defendant listened to the above from the victim, and b) the victim, “Yeman Jin, Madle, Madle, Madle, Madle, Madle, Madle,” and “Madle, Madle, Madle, Madle, Madle, Madle, Madle, Madle, Madle, Madle, Madle, etc., all of which were placed on the table table, had been able to the victim.”
In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.
2. The Defendant, who attempted to commit fire to the present building, was fluoring the above fluort at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), and was slicking the victim’s speech that the Defendant would make 112 report to the police, with the view to burning the above restaurant.
Ultimately, the Defendant posted a plastic garbage bag in which the discontinuance, etc. in the above restaurant was contained. However, around 21:15 on the same day, the Defendant discovered a fire that was sent to the site by sending the police slope, G police box, etc. to the site by a police officer assigned to the Gyeonggi Hyeong Police Station Estation, which was dispatched after receiving a report from the victim, and discovered a fire that was put to the site, and did not serve as a means of extinguishing the fire by using fire extinguishers in the above restaurant.
Thus, the defendant attempted to fire a building in which people exist, but police officers dispatched to the site were forced to commit a fire by extinguishing the fire.
Summary of Evidence
1. The protocol of seizure and the list of seizure of the police's statement concerning D's legal statement of the defendant.