beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2018.05.31 2017고단1833

폐기물관리법위반

Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

2...

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant C is the final waste disposal company, Defendant C is the final waste disposal company, Defendant A is the actual operator as the Chairperson of C, Defendant B is the representative director of C from March 28, 2017 to June 26, 2017.

1. A person who has received an order to improve waste disposal facilities for joint crimes committed by Defendant A and Defendant B shall comply with such order;

Nevertheless, Defendants did not comply with the order of improvement, even though they jointly received from the F market until June 7, 2017, to manage the water level of 2-1 construction section landfill facilities by the F market at the place of business around December 8, 2016, up to five meters.

2. The defendant C was a de facto operator A and the representative director of the defendant

B The date and place described in paragraph 1 were the same as that described in paragraph 1.

"2017 Highest 1949"

1. A person who has received an improvement order for the waste disposal facilities of Defendant B shall comply with the order;

Nevertheless, on June 28, 2016, the Defendant failed to comply with the order issued by the head of the Daegu Regional Environment Office at the place of a stock company around June 28, 2016, to improve the water level of 5-2 Section landfill facilities by up to 5 meters from June 27, 2017, in compliance with the waste disposal standards.

2. Defendant E served as the representative director of C from June 27, 2017.

A person who installs and operates waste disposal facilities shall undergo the first regular inspection within one year from the commencement date of use, and shall undergo a second or subsequent regular inspection within three years from the date of the last regular inspection.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at the place of business C, did not undergo the second regular inspection of the four sections of the landfill facility, which was the first regular inspection on June 12, 2014, from the place of business C, until July 11, 2017.

3. Defendant C Co., Ltd.