beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2017.08.31 2017고단314

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 5, 2014, the Defendant: (a) requested to lend money to B on or around November 5, 2014; (b) requested to do so; and (c) demanded to be believed even if he/she was designated as a collateral; (d) the lessee of the “D” in the operation of the Defendant who was on the racing-si level C, was willing to forge and deliver a real estate lease agreement as the Defendant is.

On November 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) made in the column of Article 3, “The name of the said real estate shall be determined on May 20, 2010; (b) on May 20, 2010; and (c) on the column of section 4, “The name of the said real estate shall be determined on May 20, 2010; and (c) on May 20, 2010; and (d) on the column of section 4, the Defendant voluntarily made a seal affixed by the said Defendant, stating “The name of the said real estate shall be determined on May 20, 201,” “The name of the said real estate shall be determined on May 20, 201; and (d) in the column of section 4, “The name of the said real estate shall be determined on May 3, 201; and (e) the name of the said Defendant shall be located on the column of the lessor.”

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising rights and obligations, forged a copy of G real estate lease agreement in the name of G, a private document.

2. On November 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) borrowed money from B, who is aware of the forgery in the foregoing investigation document; and (b) exercised the said forged real estate lease contract with B as if it was a document duly formed.

3. The Defendant, around November 25, 2014, would lend money to the victim B from the above D to the victim B until March 25, 2015.

Since the lease claim of D building currently operated has been secured, it is expected to keep the lease contract as security to the party.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “,” and as above, a forged real estate lease agreement was delivered to the victim.

However, the facts are that the defendant had already been employed by H on December 2014.