교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
On September 17, 2018, the Defendant was a person engaged in driving B rocketing taxi, and was driving the said taxi on September 17, 2018, and led D front roads in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to turn to the left to the left from the spons of the new distance distance.
At that time, the signal apparatus is installed, so in this case, there was a duty to observe the signal apparatus and safely drive the vehicle to prevent the accident in advance.
Nevertheless, even though the signal of the front side was changed by yellow light, the Defendant got off the front part of GHJ125T-16D two-wheel automobiles operated by the injured party F (F, South and the age of 33) who violated the signal at the right direction due to occupational negligence and left left the left, and suffered injury, such as cutting off the front part of the front part of the above taxi, which was driven by the victim F (F, South and the age of 33).
Summary of Evidence
1. Each legal statement of the defendant and the upper accused;
1. A yellow survey report, a blackbbox image CD;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;
1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under Relevant Acts concerning criminal facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;
1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The sentencing reasons under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order include cases involving injury by traffic accident between the defendant and the victim, illegality degree of each fault between the defendant and the victim involved in the accident, parts and degree of injury, smooth agreement, transport-related criminal records, reflectivity, etc., the sentencing conditions as stated in the arguments of this case shall be equally considered.
It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.