A. The Plaintiff is a person who, until January 14, 2012, works for the Feminity of the Feminity Association (hereinafter “instant clan”) as a general secretary and was in charge of the management of property, etc.

B. On January 19, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a mortgage agreement with the Defendants, among the clans of this case, which is a cause of the instant clan, which is “650 square meters,” which is “the Defendants of the neighboring mortgagee, the maximum debt amount of KRW 50,00,00,000,” and completed the registration of establishment of a neighboring district court as the receipt of the branch office of the Chungcheong District Court under Article 621 on the same day.

(2) The court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to the registration of establishment of a new collective security and establishment of a new collective security and establishment of a new collective security and establishment of a new collective security and establishment of a new collective security and establishment of a new collective security and establishment of a new collective security and establishment of a new collective security

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff asserted as the plaintiff's general secretary of the clan of this case performed the duty of paying the construction cost to the clan G, etc. that the clan of this case contracted to G.

On November 201, the Plaintiff withdrawn money without affixing the seal of one of the holders of the passbooks in which the money owned by the instant clan was deposited, and paid the construction price without obtaining the warranty insurance policy.

The plaintiff created the right to collateral security of this case in the name of the defendants, who are the members of the same clan, to guarantee the damage claim that the clan of this case has against the plaintiff due to the above negligence.

After that, on May 17, 2015, G completed the defect repair work due to the above construction, and the damage claim against the plaintiff of the clan of this case was all extinguished.

Therefore, since all secured claims of the instant collateral have expired, the Defendants are obligated to implement the procedure for cancellation registration of the establishment registration of the instant collateral to the Plaintiff.

B. The Defendants’ assertion does not aim at guaranteeing damage liability related to the repair of defects in the reconstruction work, etc., but also at guaranteeing the Plaintiff’s claim.