beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.10.06 2015고단1130

공무집행방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 6, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 23:20 on the street in front of the Cheongju-si, a Cheongju-si, called “D” restaurant, which is located in a considerable area of Cheongju-si, and was in danger of day-to-day the vehicle and accident in which a U.S. ton sing a bicycle while riding a horse while drinking; (b) upon receipt of a report for the foregoing reason, the Defendant used the horses from F in the circumstances where the E District was affiliated with the E District and dispatched to the site, demanding the above F to hear and return to Korea, “I will have returned to it, such as having no special damage, and having a driver go to go back to it,” and the said F to “I will come well to go back to what you want?” and the Defendant assaulted, such as: (c) b5 minutes of the b5 minutes of the f’s chest by taking a bath and taking a hand, and assaulted three times of the f’s chest.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers regarding the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the G production;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As long as a fine has been selected for a crime on the grounds of sentencing in Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the sentencing criteria of the Supreme Court’s sentencing committee shall not apply.

The contents and results of the crime, the circumstances of the crime, the degree of the assault used, contingent crimes, no criminal record in the same kind, reflectivity, and other various sentencing conditions specified in the arguments in this case shall be determined the same as the order.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.