When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 17, 2018, at around 20:47, the Defendant sought a photograph of the police officer dispatched to the Defendant’s cell phone by saying, “I am home, so I would like to read, read, “I am home, I will see,” and read, “I am home, I will take a photograph,” and said F will take the photograph of the police officer dispatched to the Defendant’s cell phone, and then I am “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling Table;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. A punishment is determined as ordered by taking full account of all favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the crime of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is recognized and erroneous, and that there is no record of the same kind of crime, and that there is no record of the same crime during the suspended execution period, which are favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant committed the crime during the suspended execution period, and that the police officer in charge of performing official duties is not very good to commit the crime due to the use of violence, and other unfavorable circumstances, such as the defendant’s age, character and behavior, motive of the crime, the degree of the type of the crime committed by the defendant,