게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
The Defendants are not guilty.
1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) from December 4, 2010 to the 10th day of the same month, the Defendants: (b) from the “E” room located in Jeju Island; (c) from the 11st computer to the “G server, the game software grading committee rated by the game software; (d) the contents of the game software rated by the Game Rating Board by manipulating the keyboard according to the game users’ ability, and (e) acquiring points by putting the target in order; and (e) obtaining points by c.33% of the target water; (e) the energy is reduced to 3.33% of the target water; and (e) the three conflicts with the Gost City (FIH) from the 10th day of the same month, the game machine will appear at the 60th day of the same month; (e) the game will not be 10% of the total amount of the fee and 16% of the game software will have been distributed to the game with the 10th day of the weather.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to offer game products different from the rating contents to customers for use.
2. Determination
A. In this case’s assertion and issues, the Defendants’ contents of the indictment that the Defendants provided game products different from the classified game products can be said to be three of the automatic progress function, energy loss rate, and normal fishing frequency.
As to this, the Defendants asserted that, as online game products, the instant game products only allowed the Defendants to use the game products provided by the F’s server after receiving user fees from the customers, and that there was no change in the game products or provision for use with the knowledge of such change.
Therefore, the issues in this case are whether the defendants change the contents of the game product of this case differently.