손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. Basic facts
A. The defendant is a doctor who works in the extracurricular division of the D Hospital operated by the school juristic person C (hereinafter “instant hospital”).
B. On July 5, 2011, the Plaintiff taken a self-official image of the instant hospital (hereinafter referred to as “MIM”) upon the Plaintiff’s visit to the left-hand shoulder, with the pain on the left-hand shoulder, on June 10, 2011. The extreme part of the left-hand screen was observed.
Accordingly, on July 5, 201, the defendant diagnosed the plaintiff's symptoms as a part of the collision symptoms, and "the first operation to the left-hand satisfe type less than 'the first operation to the left-hand satfe type less than the upper-hand satfe type' as the operation method.
B At the same time, after checking the state where the cross-speak space becomes narrow and the gap with the extreme part-time, it was first found that the speak-wing speaked speaked speaked speaked speaked speaked speaked speaked spe
다. 1차 수술 이후 원고의 치료 내역 원고는 1차 수술을 받고 퇴원한 이후 2011. 7. 18., 2011. 7. 25., 2011. 8. 1., 2011. 8. 24., 2011. 9. 5., 2011. 9. 6., 2011. 9. 10., 2011. 9. 22. 이 사건 병원에 내원하였는데 ㉠ 2011. 7. 18.은 봉합사를 제거하고 진단서를 발급받았고, ㉡ 2011. 7. 25.은 물리치료를 받았으며, ㉢ 2011. 8. 1.은 통증유발점 주사를 맞고 흉터제거제인 더마틱스를 처방받았고, ㉣ 2011. 8. 24.은 운동교육을 받았으며, ㉤ 2011. 9. 5.은 요가 운동을 하면서 근육 운동을 한 후 통증이 있어 에어탈정, 알비스정, 뮤렉스정을 처방받았고, ㉥ 2011. 9. 6.은 15년간 지속된 우측 둔부 통증을 진단받았으며, ㉦ 2011. 9. 10. 우측 둔부 통증의 원인을 밝히기 위한 MRI 촬영을 받았고, ㉧ 2011. 9. 22.은 2011. 9. 10. 시행한 MRI 결과를 확인하였다.
On July 25, 2011, the Plaintiff prescribed six times of physical treatment from the Defendant, but performed physical treatment at the instant hospital only once on the day, and did not receive physical treatment at the instant hospital. E.