The part against the plaintiffs is reversed, and that part of the case is remanded to the Seoul High Court.

1. Where multiple parcels of land in the first ground for appeal are indivisible for the purpose of use, barring special circumstances, it is reasonable to consider the whole parcels of land as one parcel, and investigate the characteristics of the land as one parcel, and evaluate the whole at a single price as a single price. Here, “where the situation used as one parcel of land is indivisible for the purpose of use” refers to the case where the situation in which the land is used as one parcel of land is deemed reasonable and reasonable in terms of social, economic and administrative aspects,

(1) According to the reasoning of the lower judgment and the record, the lower court’s determination that the land category was “site” is “site,” and used as the office, parking lot, maintenance place, and large skill training place, whereas the land category was “N, P, R,O, and Q,” and the land category was “N,” and the land category was “N, P, II, and II,” and the land category was used as the site for the 1,2, and the 23,000 square meters of the 2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m23,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,01,000 m2,000 m2,06,000 m2,06,000 m2,01,06.