If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On February 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven a D Spo-type car on the front of the convenience store located in the C convenience store located in the B at the Gyang-si; and (b) moved from the right edge to the northwest apartment site.

At this time, the crosswalk is installed, and the surrounding condition was that, so the defendant has a duty of care to drive while paying attention to the safety of pedestrians, such as stopping at the front of the crosswalk or taking a tent and living well around it.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to perform the above duty of care and caused the victim E, who was standing on the left side of the defendant's course due to the occupational negligence, to go beyond the defendant's car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as “multi-marction inception,” which requires approximately 10 weeks of medical treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A traffic accident report (1 deemed), a traffic accident report, and the evidence and photograph of a traffic accident;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the report of investigation;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2) and Article 3(2)6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.