beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.06.02 2013가합542359

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,00,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from July 2, 2013 to September 23, 2013 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Relevant status and relationship 1) The Plaintiff was integrated into 10,112 blocks-centered block-based commercial areas in the Eunpyeong New Venture Zone-centered Urban Development Zone-centered, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and 10,11, and 12 in the process of developing the development project. Total land is 50,425,25 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

(2) The project undertaken to build commercial facilities, residential facilities, etc. to build an integrated development project for commercial areas centering on the development zone of Eunpyeong New Town (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”).

The Plaintiff is the operator of a public-private partnership project. The Plaintiff established a project company invested by the Plaintiff and the private business entity, and then publicly recruited PF project that requires the company to implement the project refers to a public-private partnership project that implements the project after the public and the private sector jointly invested in a specific site owned by the public sector to select a private business entity to conduct the development project, and the public-private partnership project that implements the project after the public and the private sector jointly invested in the development project. The Plaintiff formed a public-private partnership project to implement the project through a public-private partnership project. 2) Construction Mutual Aid Association, Korea Development Bank, Korea Development Bank, Korea National Bank, Han Bank, Hyundai Construction Bank, Han Bank, Taenam Bank (hereinafter referred to as the “Seoul Bank”) and Gyeongnam Bank (hereinafter referred to as the “Gyeongnam Bank”) constituted a public-private partnership project plan to participate in the public-private partnership project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant agreement”).

B. On June 30, 2008, upon entering into the instant project agreement, the instant consortium was designated as a priority negotiation subject in the said public offering procedure. The instant consortium and the Plaintiff, on October 6, 2008, for the instant project on October 6, 2008, shall conduct an integrated development project centered on the commercial area in the Eunpyeong New Zealand Urban Development Zone.