When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 02:40 on July 9, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on the roads in front of the E agency located in Changwon-si Masan Port; and (b) on the passenger car of the designated F, the Defendant f, when F was fluored by a slope H, a police officer belonging to the Masan Central Police Station G, for drinking, she saw H as “Chewing fluor, the police fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor.”

As above, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the traffic control by police officers and the prevention of traffic hazards.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of H prepared by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (as to attachment of photographs of damage);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of a fine for selective punishment (the fact that the person's mistake and reflects the wrongness, the fact that H does not want the punishment of the defendant, the fact that H does not have the same power as that of the defendant, and the occupation,

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;