청소년보호법위반
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of the following facts: (a) juveniles of this case, including E in the summary of the grounds for appeal, consistently stated that they were not required to produce identification cards at a business establishment operated by the Defendant; and (b) according to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the Defendant is recognized to have sold alcoholic beverages knowing that
However, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant is erroneous in misconception of facts.
2. Based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below on the facts charged of this case, the court below found the defendant not guilty on the grounds that the facts charged of this case constitutes a case where there is no proof of crime. A thorough comparison of the records of this case and the reasoning of the judgment of the court below with the records of this case, the court below's above judgment is acceptable, and it is judged that there was no error of mistake of facts even after examining
Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.