When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 9, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim B to send a cultural merchandise coupon equivalent to KRW 100,000,000 to the victim B, which is a trading site on the Internet.

In fact, even if the defendant received KRW 90,00 from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to send cultural merchandise coupons.

Around February 21:13, 2017, the Defendant acquired 90,000 won from the injured party to the bank C (deposit holders: D) account, and acquired 8,60,000 won through 4 times in the name of selling mobile phones by April 3, 2017, such as the List of Crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. A or D suspect examination protocol for each police officer;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement of B, F, and G;

1. Application of statutes to the details of each transfer, the closure of a conversation, the details of dialogue, the details of transfers, evidential data, the receipt, evidential data, and the details of dialogue;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;