2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the Defendant, who led to the instant crime, led to the confession of and reflect on the instant crime, the amount of damage is not significant, the recovery of some damaged articles, and the mother should support.

B. However, on November 23, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for ten months with prison labor for larceny, and the Defendant committed another larceny during the repeated crime period, and the Defendant committed a larceny on seven occasions against a large number of victims, and attempted to commit a theft on two occasions, and attempted to commit a crime. The Defendant committed a theft on two occasions. There is bad quality of the crime, two times of punishment due to larceny, one time of fine, one time of punishment due to a juvenile protective disposition, and six times of punishment by the victims until the trial, and other various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the instant argument, including the Defendant’s age, details of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, are considered in full view of the above circumstances favorable to the Defendant, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.

C. Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.