When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Defendant

In addition, C, D, E, and F, the Defendant and F, I, J, and K were set up against C, D, and E in opposition to each other in front of the H restaurant located in the Gunsan City, around November 14, 2015, when they agreed to and moved to the post of the police box located in the Gunsan City, around November 14, 2015.

When the Defendant and F, together with I, J, and K, as above, were to be done at the above time and at the above location, F was to take the face of the Victim C (27 years old) by taking advantage of the steel stuffr in front of H restaurant, and F was to take the face of the Victim C (27 years old), and the Defendant was to take the face of the Victim C by drinking together with it, and the Defendant was to take the face of the Victim C (3 years old), while I was to take the head of the Victim D(33 years old), while I was to take the part of the Victim C’s face, while K was to take the head of the Victim C by taking advantage of the steel stuffr in front of H restaurant.

Accordingly, according to the medical certificate submitted by D for about a week to the victim D (in the investigation record, 74 pages) by assaulting the victim C and the victim D in cooperation with F, etc., the defendant suffered injury to the victim C, such as the mouths, closure, etc., which require approximately four weeks of treatment, and according to the medical certificate submitted by D for about a seven-day period, the treatment period is specified as 7 days. As such, the "two-day" as stated in this part of the facts charged appears to be a clerical error.

The main part of the left-hand head in need of treatment was respectively opened.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against D, F, C, or E;

1. Application of each statute of diagnosis of C and D

1. Article 2 (2) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense; and Article 25 of the same Act concerning the selection of a sentence;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of the reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the crime’s nature is not weak in light of the means and method of the instant crime, the degree of damage, etc., and the victim.