If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On January 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would approve the price within one month after the delivery of the goods” when requesting the victim C to supply bathing goods at the site of building Yan-gun B and 2 lots of telecom.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the price even if he receives the bathing goods from the injured party to be installed in the telecom.

Nevertheless, on January 15, 2016, the victim was supplied with sanitary supplies of the amount of KRW 8880,000,000 to the victim, and the victim did not pay the price, thereby acquiring economic benefits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to contracts, specifications, electronic tax invoices, investigation reports (hereinafter referred to as NAC), investigation reports (as regards the place of Mour and pentine public notice, and market prices);

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;