beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.10.11 2016가단14426

임금

Text

1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s claim is all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff (appointed party).

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On January 21, 2013, the Defendant ordered “B” from the Public Procurement Service, and subcontracted the production and installation works of soil structures and complex cover KRW 4,096,40,000 to the Specialized Forest Construction Company (hereinafter “Dong Forest Construction Company”). On August 12, 2014, the Defendant subcontracted the construction works of soil structures, earth and drainage structures at KRW 12,623,60,000.

B. From February 2, 2013 to December 2, 2015, the Defendant paid the subcontract price for the subcontracted work at the request of the payment for completed portion from February 2, 2013 to December 2, 2015, and most of them agreed to a request for a direct payment for the payment of the subcontract price, etc. to the subcontractor.

다. 동림종건이 2016. 1.경 이후 하도급공사를 중단하면서 하수급인에 대한 하도급대금 등의 지급을 지체하자, 피고가 동림종건에 하도급계약을 해지한다는 의사표시를 한 다음, 동림종건과 사이에 공사와 관련하여 거래관계에 있던 하수급인 등에게 직접 하도급대금 등의 지체 사실을 심사하여 “조속 체불 문제가 해결되어 여러분도 생업에 매진할 수 있도록 미력한 힘을 보탤 것을 약속”하면서 이를 확인할 수 있는 자료를 제출할 것을 촉구하는 문자메시지를 보냈다. 라.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff and the designated parties (hereinafter “Plaintiffs, etc.”) provided labor on the construction site and requested the Defendant to pay labor costs. However, on May 31, 2015, the Defendant responded that it is difficult to recognize the fact that the Plaintiff and the designated parties did not complete safety education and did not provide labor.

[Grounds for recognition] Gap 1, Eul 1 through 4-38, 6-1, and 6-2, Eul's testimony and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The Plaintiff is either directly or through the Plaintiff, etc. from September 2015 to December 2015.