2. 50,000 won where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

On August 23, 2011, at around 20:40, the Defendant: (a) received a notice from the slopeF belonging to the Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station, called “D,” which called “D” operated by Pyeongtaek-si, to drink alcohol with the drinking value of the said C and the alcohol level; and (b) received a notice from the Defendant that he would be arrested as a flagrant offender for the aforementioned fraud; (c) the Defendant expressed his desire to read “spacker, frib, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, police son,” and interfered with the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender on two occasions with the upper floor of the two hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of each police statement against F and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to receipts, on-site photographs, and investigation reports;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;