2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by each person;

A. On March 3, 2003, while entering the Hanchip Engineering Co., Ltd., the Plaintiff was on September 6, 2007, who was working for the Hanchip Engineering Co., Ltd., and became a suspender for the purpose of the braille planting on September 6, 2007, while getting off the entrance from the entrance of the entrance, and became a bridge.

B. On June 16, 2008, the Plaintiff was awarded disability ratings 7 applicable mutatis mutandis on the ground that “the Plaintiff was treated as “the eromatic eromatic eromatic eromatic erogrosis, the right eromatic erogrosis, the right erogrosis, and the right erogrosis damage.” From the Defendant on the ground that the Plaintiff constitutes “a person who was unable to properly erognize one of the three major sections of the erogrosis (class 8)” and “a person who was unable to properly erognive erograt (class 12).”

C. After that, from August 8, 2008 to August 28, 2008, the Plaintiff re-medical care was provided for the removal of satisfaction pin, and two years have passed since the Plaintiff became subject to the disability re-determination and received a special medical examination.

On November 11, 2011, based on the Plaintiff’s opinion on the foregoing special diagnosis, the Defendant deliberated on the Plaintiff’s state of disability and rendered the instant disposition to pay disability compensation annuities by changing the disability grade to class 14 with the disability grade No. 10 and class 14.

On the other hand, this Court, while continuing this lawsuit on October 1, 2013, for the prompt and smooth resolution of disputes to the plaintiff and the defendant on October 1, 201, changed the disability grade to the 8th grade.

2. The plaintiff withdraws the lawsuit of this case immediately after the defendant changed the above disposition, and the defendant consents thereto.

3. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by each person;

'' has recommended the adjustment of the contents.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed an objection against the recommendation for mediation on October 21, 2013, but the Defendant revoked the disposition of November 11, 201 in accordance with the purport of the said recommendation for mediation on October 28, 2013, and changed the disability grade to 8 for the Plaintiff.