When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 2, 2018, the Defendant used the victim’s cell phone in a way that the victim C(43 Dop) was faced with the victim’s opposition to the D Housing Redevelopment Project, and the Defendant took the victim’s cell phone by following the victim’s cell phone while shooting the victim’s cell phone on the left hand to fit the victim’s face. On February 2, 2018, the Defendant used the victim’s cell phone in a way that the victim’s right booms the victim’s right side with his left drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. The 112 Report Processing table of the case (the defendant and his defense counsel claimed that the defendant's cell phone was friendly by the victim's left hand, but the above mobile phone did not fit the victim's face, and that the victim's face was not taken by the victim's face due to left drinking, so the following circumstances, which can be known by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, can be seen by the investigation agency, namely, the victim's photographed the victim's cell phone at his own hand, followed the victim's face by the victim's cell phone, followed by the defendant's left hand, and the victim's face was taken by the victim's cell phone, followed by the defendant's left hand, when the victim's face was taken by the victim's cell phone, and the defendant made a concrete and biological statement about the situation at the time, and there is some disagreements with the victim's statement in the investigation agency, but it seems difficult to make the victim's statement accurately from the beginning. The defendant's core statement is consistent with the part of the crime.