If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On May 2, 2012, the Defendant had a majority of the staff members of the original department E outside the office of the hospital located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the F is the head of the F (Appellant) administration who is not the head of the office of the attorney-at-law, and the counterpart part of the redevelopment project is the head of the F (Executive Secretary) administration who is the head of the F) administration, and the counterpart part of the redevelopment project is the head of the F (Executive Director) administration. In the process of redevelopment promotion, the first term and the statement is changed from time to time, and the statement is changed, and the Defendant again took charge of the work, and the head of the executive office was replaced by the fraud, and damaged the reputation of the complainant by stating the false fact that the same person who is converted into the low morale is the person in charge of this hospital.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the statement of witness F and G in the second protocol of trial;

1. Relevant Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the provisional payment order against the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserts that the defendant did not make any statement identical to the facts charged, and that even if the defendant made a statement identical to the facts charged, there is no performance.

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, the defendant, at the office of the principal department in the hospital, made a statement to E as stated in the facts charged, and thereafter, there is a performance in view of the following process, etc.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion cannot be accepted.