However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 15, 2018, around 14:30, the Defendant: (a) experienced a point of view of the method of work from the victim C (36:3) who was the director of the public service at the construction site among the construction site traffic guidance at the construction site site site site site construction site site site, and (b) caused brooms of trees located at the site, and (c) caused two times of the head of the victim, the Defendant saw the victim as his hand and her brooms of trees located at the site, and caused thirthy with no one in which there is no one in which there is a need for treatment

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (to hear statements of a wooden shot person), a written diagnosis of injury, and a photograph of victim face;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, committed the instant crime even though he had the record of six criminal punishment regarding the use of violence, including three years of imprisonment due to assault and death in 209.

The defendant's head is very poor in light of the method of crime, such as brooms by brooming the victim's head into a wooden broom, and then brooms are again brooms and prices the head of the victim.

The victim did not reach an agreement with the victim and made other efforts to recover the damage.

There are no circumstances to see.

However, the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected in the crime of this case shall be considered as normal in favor of the defendant.

In addition, the records of this case, including the defendants' age, sex, family relation, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., and the various sentencing factors in the previous theories, shall be comprehensively considered, and the punishment as ordered shall be determined.