If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a company member, and the victim C is divorced from the victim on February 2008.

On February 4, 2013, the defendant, at around 06:40, tried not to contact the divorcedd victim but to find him as a D parking lot where the victim's vehicle is parked.

The defendant who has arrived at this place had two wheels in front and one wheels behind the driver's seat with the Epoter vehicle owned by the victim, and had the latter wheels of the driver's seat after deducting the air from the latter in an irregular way, thereby reducing the utility of the property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Report on occurrence (damage and destruction of property), investigation report, and investigation report (receiving a list of reported cases);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 366 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.