부동산인도등
1. Of the real estate listed in the attached Table 1 list to the Plaintiff
A. Defendant A and B shall set forth in paragraph 1 of the attached Table 2.
1. The assertion and judgment
A. Facts of recognition 1) The plaintiff is the Namnam Trade Co., Ltd. on November 25, 1991 (hereinafter referred to as "Ynam Trade").
E in the Mapo-si, Mapo-si, E which he had newly built, (hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”).
(2) The sales contract was concluded for the sales of the instant real estate in the amount of KRW 620,00,000. The sales contract was concluded for the sales of the instant real estate in the amount of KRW 620,000. 2) The sales contract was divided into 10 or more stores, and the Defendant A sold the attached Table 2 List No. 1 (hereinafter “instant real estate No. 1”) and the attached Table No. 2 List No. 2 (hereinafter “instant real estate No. 2”) and the Defendant B paid part of the sales price, such as the down payment, to the Antarctic Trade.
3) The parties did not pay the Plaintiff the sales price in time, and the Plaintiff completed the registration of initial ownership on the instant real estate on August 6, 1993 without receiving the sales price of KRW 233,224,080 from the Nam Trade. (4) When the Nam Trade did not pay the Plaintiff the sales price, Defendant A occupied the instant real estate, Defendant A occupied Schlage, and Defendant B occupied the instant real estate, and began to operate a golf driving range. The Plaintiff filed an application for provisional disposition against Defendant A and B, with the Suwon District Court Decision 2006Kadan13022 on September 22, 2006, and the said decision was executed around that time.
5) At the time of the closure of the argument in this case, the real estate of Paragraph (1) of this case is operated and possessed by Defendant B, and the real estate of Paragraph (2) of this case is in possession of a new business facility by Defendant C. [The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in subparagraphs A and 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings.]
B. According to the facts of the judgment 1 above, at the time of enforcement of the provisional injunction against the transfer of possession, Defendant A and B occupied the real estate of this case without title, and the above.