임금
1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs the amount corresponding to the "total amount of principal and interest" stated in attached Table 2.
1. The following facts may be acknowledged if there is no dispute between the parties, or if Gap evidence Nos. 1, 1, 2, and 6 show the purport of the entire pleadings. A
The defendant is a company producing and selling kimchi air conditioners, air conditioners, etc., and the plaintiffs are employees employed by and working for the defendant.
B. According to the Defendant’s wage and allowance-related provisions, monthly salary paid by the Defendant to workers is divided into basic salary and allowance. Ordinary wage, which serves as the basis for calculating the various allowances, is based on the total amount of basic salary and position allowances, production allowances, hazard allowances, continuous service allowances, qualification allowances, QC allowances, physical training allowances, self-development allowances, and skill skilled allowances. However, during the various allowances, the root year allowances, weekly overtime work allowances, weekly work allowances, payment criteria monthly ordinary wage, 240 hours ± 150 x 240 x monthly ordinary wage for overtime work hours ± 150 x 150 x 150 x 150 x 150 x 10 x 10 x 10% holiday work allowances, and the detailed calculation method of parking allowances are as follows.
C. According to the Defendant’s retirement allowance-related provisions, when a worker who has worked for more than one year retires, the amount calculated by “the number of years of service 】 the average wage for 30 days (=the total amount of wages paid for three months prior to the date on which the grounds for calculating average wages arise ¡À the total number of days for the above three months)” shall be paid as retirement allowances.
The plaintiffs are the defendant's workers, and the plaintiff 1 through 149 as the plaintiff 1 and 250 as to the plaintiff 150 through 250, and the plaintiff 251 through 257 as to the legal allowances from July 2007 to December 201 as to the receipt of monthly legal allowances from the defendant from each of the defendant. The plaintiff 1 and 149 are calculated without reflecting the amount of the monthly allowances, regardless of the fact that the payment of monthly allowances from the defendant from July 2007 to December 201.