손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants and the appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.
2...
1. The plaintiffs and the defendants' grounds for appeal are not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance court. Even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court shows additional evidence submitted in this court, it is acknowledged that the facts of the first instance court and the judgment are justified.
Therefore, the reasoning for this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for partial dismissal or addition as set forth in the following paragraph 2. Thus, the court cites this case as it is, including summary language, pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (Provided, That the part against the Defendants of the first instance court joint Plaintiff A, B, C, D, H, I, I, and J, which became separate and final, excluding the part against the Defendants of the first instance court). 2. The part which is advanced or added on February 8, 201 and 7 of the first instance court’s “No. 6, 2017” as “No. 7, 2016.”
The first instance judgment’s 13th page 13 is “i.e., one’s conduct,” and thereafter, the Defendants added “if the Defendants are deemed to have committed a joint tort by aiding and abetting the deceased’s tort by negligence, the damage to be compensated by the Defendants is the damage suffered by the Plaintiffs due to the joint tort, and is not limited to the economic interests they acquired.”
3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate. Thus, all appeals against the Defendants and appeals against the Defendants are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.