except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On January 20, 2013, the Defendant sought to calculate the fee by credit card from the victim D(67 years of age)’s private taxi on the front route of Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, to board the victim D(67 years of age) to the above destination. However, on the ground that the victim was able to account in cash, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant was the victim’s face “I am her mam. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am.)”; and (b) the victim’s face was bleeped twice by drinking, and went beyond the floor.

As a result, the defendant injured the victim about 14 days of treatment, such as a bad straw, etc.

2. On January 21, 2013, the Defendant damaged public goods to repair KRW 660,000,00, while putting the bricks in front of the Seongbuk Police Station 112 comprehensive situation room located in the Seongdong-gu, Daegu-gu, Seodong-gu, Seodong-gu, and putting about 112, which is a public object managed by the aforesaid Seongbuk Police Station, toward the glass window of the outer wall of the above situation room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate and quotation;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury, the choice of imprisonment), and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of damage to public goods and the choice of imprisonment) of the relevant law on the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the recovery of damage, the detention life for a certain period of time, and the fact that it seriously reflects the life under detention) or more;