However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant from January 2015 to the same year

2. From the end of 16.16. In operating a marina business with the trade name “E” in Ansan-gu, the company received 80,000 won from the customers who employed women such as P, G, and H, and received 80,000 won from the above business place, and paid 40,000 won out of them to the above women, and caused the above women to engage in similar sexual intercourse by receiving money from many and unspecified male customers who found in the above business place, and by making the above women to see their sexual intercourse by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement in preparation of I, J, K, L, and M;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Investigation report (Calculation of profits from the sexual traffic);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic (referring to the occupation of arranging sexual traffic) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The former part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. The sentencing period of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order [the scope of recommending punishment] among the brokerage of commercial sex acts subject to the age of 19 or older, the scope of sentencing in the basic area of Type II (the brokerage of commercial sex acts, etc. by giving and receiving compensation for business, etc.) shall be sentenced to imprisonment for not less than six months and not more than one year and not more than four months. [Pronouncement of sentence] In light of the number of rooms, the scale of business place, the size of month rent, the number of employees at the time of crackdown, etc., it seems that profits from the business size and business are reasonable, but it is against the law, there is no record of criminal records and imprisonment