beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2014.07.03 2014고정135

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of Obama with CJ50 new technologies. A.

On March 10, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”), driving an Obaba, and driving an Obaba, which is located in the sampling road in order to drive a sub-fababab, and driving two-lanes of the two-lane roads from the side of the sampling tunnel to the side of the sub-permanent apartment.

There shall be a private-distance intersection where traffic is controlled by signal, etc.

In such cases, there was a duty of care to drive safely in accordance with the direction of signal apparatus in the intersection where traffic control is performed by signal, etc. as a person engaged in off-to-land driving.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and found out the pedestrian D (53 years old) crossinging the crosswalk in accordance with the top signal such as the pedestrian signal from the right right side of the Mamatoba in the direction of the direction of the direction of the direction of the direction of the direction of the direction of the direction of the Matoba, which is late back, and operated rapidly, but the part of the Matoba did not reach the front part of the Mababa, and caused the pedestrian body part to shock on the road.

As a result, pedestrians D suffered injury such as dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium.

B. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Unlicensed Driving) is to operate a 5 km section from E in a regular Eup without a motorcycle driver's license, such as the preceding paragraph (A) to the front corner of the shooting distance of the secondary apartment from E in the city to E in the same city.

C. The holder of Oral Ba in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, even though he is prohibited from operating any motor vehicle, etc. which is not covered by mandatory insurance, such as liability insurance, on the road, was driving the above Oral Ba that is not covered by compulsory insurance such as “A”.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. On-site reports (on-site survey reports) and on-site photographs;