beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.22 2014고정2605

절도

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Since basic facts are identical and there is no substantial disadvantage in exercising the defendant's right to defend, the criminal facts are recognized as follows without changing the indictment.

1. On February 2, 2014, at around 23:50 on the first day, the Defendant embezzled the Defendant’s thought to have on his own, without following the necessary procedures, such as her own possession, by having the victim C laid down his kne and kne kne on two descendants, her knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee, and returning the victim’s cell phone at the market price.

2. Around 01:00 on March 13, 2014, the Defendant embezzled the Defendant’s thought to have, without following necessary procedures, the victim D put the victim D into the right-hand part of the online bus No. 500 in Gangnam-gu passenger bus, fall under the influence of alcohol, and returned the victim a cell phone of KRW 1,00,000 between the market value.

3. The Defendant, around 01:00 on March 201, 201, 510: (a) was operated from Seoul Station to the Deputy Director of the Bus of the Gyeonghee University in Seoul Station, while the Victim E was knicked by the victim E.

In addition, the market value of 1 million won of the Trigal lugal lugal lugal lugal lugal lugal lugal lugal lugal lugal lug.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness C, D, and E;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure of mobile phones;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Parts of the offense under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the provisional payment order;

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On February 2, 2014, the Defendant interested in the Gyeonggi-si Gag-dong on a day at around 23:50 of the first day.