beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.04.17 2013고단384

사행행위등규제및처벌특례법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 11, 2013, the Defendant violated the Installation and Utilization of Sports Facilities Act: (a) established a party hall with the trade name “C” without reporting to the head of the competent authority on the second floor of the Seo-gu Seo-gu Seoul metropolitan building; and (b) operated the party hall business, which is a sports facility, by raising profits equivalent to an average of KRW 100,000 per day from many unspecified

2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc. from January 1, 2013 to November of the same month run in the manner of a random game in a remote manner at the above billiard from around January 1, 2013, and the same pattern of pattern, etc. is arranged in the same manner, then the Defendant installed three plastic game equipment with the points obtained from customers in the form of 1,000 won per 50 points, and exchanged the points obtained from customers into 1,00 won per 50 points, thereby engaging in speculative activities using the speculative gaming equipment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to reporting on detection (violation of the Installation and Utilization of Sports Facilities Act);

1. Article 30 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc. concerning criminal facts, Article 38 (2) 1 and Article 20 of the Installation and Utilization of Sports Facilities Act, and selection of imprisonment with labor for each type of crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Taking into account the fact that the defendant has led to the crime in this case and that there are several criminal records of the same kind in the case);