The defendant is a driver of the D car.

On September 26, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 02:10, and driven the front road of Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, into three-lanes in the direction of rocking in the direction of rocking from the high tide.

In this case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to see the front side, accurately operate the steering system and brake system of the vehicle, and prevent the accident in advance by safely driving it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to remove garbage in the front bank by negligence, and received the victim F (45 years old) who was collecting garbage in the front bank as the front part of the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, i.e., the victim, who suffered injury, such as cutting down the upper right pelle, cutting down the opening of the upper right pelle, cutting off the upper right pelle, cutting off the upper right pelle, damage to pelle pelle, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each letter of apology;

1. Reporting of a traffic accident (1) (2);

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. In a case where an injury occurs among the aggravated areas (eight months to two years) (the scope of recommendation) of the type 1 (the injury caused by a traffic accident) of the type of general traffic accident (eight months to two years) (the special aggravated) under the relevant legal provisions on criminal facts, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the reason for sentencing of imprisonment without prison labor / [the scope of recommendation penalty] [the decision of sentence] [the degree of injury inflicted on the victim due to the traffic accident

This case has been about four years ago, and the victim still has suffered inconvenience and has failed to lead a normal social life in spite of several operations.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not receive a letter from the injured party, and the defendant did not reach an agreement with the injured party, as well as intended to enjoy recovery or appraisal of the injured party, such as deposit.