유치권부존재확인청구
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the part concerning the defendant in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following dismissed portions, and thus, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence
(1) The Defendant did not state the grounds for appeal in the petition of appeal, and did not comply with the order to submit a preparatory document stating the grounds for appeal in detail by this court until the closing of pleadings, even though the Defendant was served with an order to submit a brief stating the grounds for appeal. Thereafter, the Defendant filed an application for resumption of pleadings not later than three days prior to the sentencing date, but did not appear on the sentencing date). [Attachment] Each of the “447,870,00 won” in 3-5 5-6 and 7-5 5 1 shall be deemed to be “44,487,00 won,” respectively.
Each "203" among four parallels with four parallels and six parallels shall be described as "302" respectively.
4 The term "301" during the 8th parallel is changed to "302."
5 Under the 5th page, the phrase “records 9 and images of Gap’s No. 10 (including paper numbers)” shall be read as “records and images of Gap’s No. 9”.
The 6th 12-19 parallels are as follows.
According to the video of the evidence No. 12, “4) B,” both phrases of the elevator installed inside the instant building were attached with a warning to the effect that “the Defendant Company has a lien on the instant building on May 2014.” However, according to the overall purport of the entry and pleading in the evidence No. 10, the lease contract was concluded with respect to three households of the instant building on May 11, 2014, and the lessee appears to have been delivered each time around May 22, 2014. If such warning was attached to the elevator actually used, it is impossible to use the elevator because the door of the elevator was not opened. Thus, even if the above warning was actually attached to the said elevator door on May 2014, 2014, the warning was removed after the lease of some households thereafter.
2...