However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. In the case of insult, the Defendant: (a) around July 30, 2017, at C’s main points located in the southdo Do Do Do Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Do Gun Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do

“Defects,” or, in a large sound in the place in which the president of the foregoing House is heard, the victim “doz.”

Gabb kb kb kb kb kb

C. The victim openly insultd the victim by hump guar farb wark walk.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the same time, at the same place, and at the same time, sent identification cards to E, took a bath, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of reports by 112, by pushing the left-hand hand of the said E on two occasions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of public duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act (within the scope of the sum of long-term punishments) to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including observation of protection and community service order;

1. Application of the sentencing criteria;

(a) Interference with the performance of official duties [Scope of a recommended punishment] The basic area (from June to one year and six months) (the person who is subject to special sentencing) shall not interfere with the performance of official duties.

(b) Application of the standards for handling multiple crimes: Imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months (the lower limit of the scope of sentence according to the sentencing criteria for the crimes for which the sentencing criteria are set and the crimes for which the sentencing criteria are not set are concurrent crimes in the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, as such lower limit is set);

2. Crimes that interfere with the performance of official duties by police officers, such as the crimes of this case where a sentence was rendered.