beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2015.12.18 2013구합2837

유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소

Text

1. On March 27, 2013, the Defendant’s decision on the payment of pneumoconiosis survivors’ annuities and funeral expenses against the Plaintiff is revoked.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

The deceased B(hereinafter referred to as the “the deceased”) worked for eight and a half years from October 24, 1973 to March 29, 1982 from the Korea Coal Corporation C to the collection line.

around June 2011, the Deceased expressed the type of pneumoconiosis-type 2/1, complication tbb pulmonary pulmonary tuberculosis, q/t noise diameter in the Yong-Nam Hospital at a medical corporation in Yong-Nama, the width of which is indicated by the deceased.

(E) The size of the Rule-based shape is indicated by P,q, and r, and non-permanent volume is indicated s, t, and u.q. P: Emp is not less than 1.5m and not more than 3m (p: 1.5m but not more than 10m). T is determined by the determination that the width is not less than 1.5m and not more than 3m (s: 1.5m and not more than 3m and not more than 10m; u: 10m and not more than 10m) and the determination of the 11st grade 16m disability of the deceased’s 11m disability. On April 17, 2012, the deceased was determined to be paid to the Defendant on the ground that his or her spouse’s death and her pulmonary function was aggravated on June 20, 2012 due to the increase of his or her pneumoconiosis before being hospitalized in Yong-Nam hospital and thus, the Defendant was not subject to the Defendant’s death 2.

(1) On June 21, 2013, the Plaintiff appealed and filed a request for examination against the Defendant on June 21, 2013. The Defendant rendered a decision to dismiss the Plaintiff’s request after deliberation by the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee on August 30, 2013. The Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit on November 29, 2013 (Grounds A for Recognition).

2. 4, 5,

8.Nos. 8 through 13 (including paper numbers), Eul’s Nos. 1, 2, and 5, the absence of any dispute, and the purport of the entire argument as to the Plaintiff’s death, which is the cause of death of the Deceased, was caused by pneumoconiosis and pneumoconiosis converption (dection) of the Deceased, and even if not, it is easy to terminate due to pneumoconiosis and pneumoconiosis converption.