On May 30, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and three years and six months for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Jung-gu District Court on May 30, 2008, and the execution of the said punishment was completed on January 11, 201

The defendant from February 201 to February 2011, the same year.

4. Since the Defendant was convicted of having sold and delivered philophones over 13 occasions by the 29th day, on August 25, 201, the Defendant appealed two years after having been sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on August 25, 201, but the appeal was dismissed by the said court on November 24, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 2, 2011.

C On March 201, 201, the Defendant recognized that there is no big difference in the sentence of the Defendant with respect to the part of selling philopon to D who sold philopon, and C considered that it may be exempted from punishment, and the Defendant had expressed a false testimony to the effect that the Defendant sold philopon to D.

On November 25, 2011, around 16:30 and December 16, 201, at around 14:30, the Defendant appeared as a witness of each of the Defendant cases of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (fence) with respect to Incheon District Court 201Kadan5357, the Defendant took an oath.

In the above case, the defendant testified that "D purchased from the defendant (C) who became aware of through the introduction of a witness to 400,000 won the penphone 0.8gg from the defendant (C)," "I think it is false," and "I think it is appropriate for the witness to sell the penphone from eca shop to D," and testified to "D and drug transactions are made by the witness," and "I am the witness's argument that it is not a witness, but the defendant is not a witness's argument."

However, facts are that C receives KRW 400,000 to D and sold 0.8g of philophones, and the defendant was present at that place, and there was no fact that the defendant sold philophones to D.

Ultimately, the defendant makes a false statement contrary to his memory.