성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
On February 27, 2015, the Defendant, in collaboration with the wife B, owned the 4th floor of the ground in the Jeju-si, and leased the 3th floor of the above building at KRW 5 million in lease deposit and KRW 8 million in annual rent. On April 7, 2015, the Defendant was aware that commercial sex acts take place in the above building with the notification that the above building was provided to the place of commercial sex acts by the Police Station in the Jeju-dong Police Station around April 7, 2015.
Nevertheless, on October 23, 2016, the Defendant continued to lease the three floors of the above building to D and provided the above building to E with a deposit of KRW 10 million, annual rent of KRW 12 million to operate the three floors of the above building as a marina business by accepting them from D as they are, without taking any measures after continuously leasing it to D, and provided the above building with the knowledge that E continues to engage in commercial sex acts, thereby engaging in commercial sex acts.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to general building ledgers, real estate lease contracts, and photographs at criminal scene;
1. Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense and Article 19 of the Act on the Punishment of such Acts;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;
1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment shall be determined in consideration of the following circumstances.
The favorable circumstances: Recognizing the crime, it reflects on the fact that E leaves the building of this case, and the defendant removed the signboard of the marina business establishment and took measures to avoid re-offending: The fact that the building was leased to E with the history of punishment for the same kind of crime, and the fact that the building was re-offending: Circumstances after the crime, the age of the defendant, family relations, and environment;