beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.05.15 2018구단57684

요양급여불승인처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On August 4, 2017, the Plaintiff, as a second-born male, worked as the head of the management office (the head of the living support office) at the “C” (hereinafter “instant place of business”). On August 4, 2017, the Plaintiff complained of the following: (a) around 11:43, when 67 years of age, he was under the age of 67, he was released from the D emergency room by stating: (b) “I am a vehicle during the patrol at the 1-hour underground parking lot; and (c) I seem to have a symptoms of her loss after her head was faced; and (d) I am out

② After that, on October 27, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for the payment of medical care benefits with the following grounds: (a) the Plaintiff was issued with a statement of opinion that “in the case of the instant injury and disease” due to cerebral typhism, serious cerebral chronism, and serious chronological chronological chronological chrone (“the instant injury and disease”); and (b) the Defendant was faced with his head during the underground parking lot patrol around 11:00 on August 4, 2017; and (c) thereafter, the Plaintiff went to the hospital by 119 because he/she had much blood and blood, and went to the hospital.”

③ On January 19, 2018, the Defendant decided not to grant approval for medical care benefits on the ground that “the causal link between the instant injury and disease is not recognized due to work.”

hereinafter referred to as "disposition of this case"

(ii) [Ground of recognition] unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2 and 4 (if any, numbered) and the purport of the whole pleadings;

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion was under serious stress due to the promotion of the re-contract with the management body, etc. while working in the instant workplace, and was on the part of the management body, such as the promotion of re-contract with the management body, the retirement of some employees, etc., and was in excess of 4 hours a day and more than 1 hours a day. In such a situation, the Plaintiff was on August 4, 2017, while being in parking management in a soft salt, and the Plaintiff was faced with two heads on the part of the columns, resulting in the instant injury.

As above, the plaintiff faces head in the pole is unexpected and predicted.