2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion (citing the judgment of the court of first instance) is based on the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, and thus, the same is acceptable.

3. Judgment on the main claim (cancellation of errors in important parts of the contract for modification);

A. We look at the H-Pe and the boundary fence (1) portion related to the construction cost portion of the H-Pe and the boundary fence. The Plaintiff’s claim is based on the premise. ① The design drawing of the construction of the construction of the instant case stated “H-Pe” at intervals of 1.8 meters, and the bill of quantity was written at intervals of 1.8 meters, and the bill of quantity was calculated at intervals of 1.8 meters, but the Defendant constructed H-Pe at intervals of 1.8 meters different from the bill of quantity of quantity, unlike the bill of quantity of quantity, the design drawing of the construction of the instant case was written at intervals of 2 meters, and the bill of quantity was written at intervals of 1.8 meters. However, although the bill of quantity was calculated on the basis of the bill of quantity of quantity, the Plaintiff cannot be acknowledged as having changed the contents of the construction contract of this case at intervals of 1.2 meters, the Plaintiff’s declaration of intention and the alteration of the contents of the contract of this case cannot be acknowledged as different from the contractual act of this case.