A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years and for two years and six months, respectively.

Defendant No. 2 of the seized evidence.

[criminal power] Defendant A was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. at the Daegu District Court on April 24, 2002; on March 23, 2010, Defendant A was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime at the Jeonju District Court on the same day; on January 29, 2012, Defendant A completed the execution of the sentence at the Jeonju Prison Prison; on April 11, 2003, Defendant B was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Daejeon District Court on April 11, 2003; on February 5, 2007, Defendant B was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) at the Daejeon District Court on March 23, 2010; and Defendant B terminated the previous prison and its execution on January 29, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendants jointly and severally reported Defendant A’s network at the victim E house located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, on March 27, 2013, at around 10:0, and around 10:00 on March 27, 2013, and Defendant A destroyed the equipment to correct the windows of the living room in the above house using one-person drone prepared in advance and destroyed the equipment to correct the living room in the above house with cash of KRW 302,00, which was the victim’s possession, and attempted to commit a crime by March 28, 2013, including a theft of KRW 10,349,500, total market price of KRW 4 times until March 28, 2013, as indicated in the attached list of crimes, and it did not violate the purport that it was impossible to detect stolen objects over five times in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of the F, G, H, I, J, K, L, and M;

1. E statements;

1. Previous records of judgment: A inquiry report on criminal records, etc., investigation report (the report on confirmation of the date of release of a suspect) and investigation report (the report on the date of confirmation of the criminal records falling under Article 5-4 (5) and (6) of the Special Treatment Act);

1. Habituality of the judgment of the defendant: dampness is recognized in light of the records of the crime, the frequency of the crime, the frequency of the crime, and the fact that the same kind of crime has been committed in a planned and organized manner, etc.