In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of special injury around 02:00 on February 4, 2006 among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning, on the grounds stated in its reasoning, did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the degree of proof required in criminal proceedings and the special injury, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.