beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.06.13 2018나312693

레미콘대금 청구

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the following reasons: (a) the court of first instance 5th to 14th to 17th to see “the Defendant Company has no evidence”, and thus, (b) the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act cites it as it is.

(1) According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the first instance court, the Defendant Company asserted that the Plaintiff was aware of, or could have easily known, that G, etc. was performing construction works by lending the name of the Defendant in supplying the instant ready-mixed. According to the witness G of the first instance court, according to the witness G of the first instance court, the Plaintiff’s husband, who is the owner of the instant ready-mixed, was first signed and sealed in the name of the Defendant in the name of the Defendant, and the Plaintiff’s name was sealed in the instant ready-mixed order book. As above, the Plaintiff’s signature and sealed in the name of the Defendant in the name of the Defendant, and the place where the Plaintiff’s name was affixed in the instant ready-mixed order book was K office operated by G. However, the Plaintiff’s pre-sale contract was made in the name of the Defendant, including number No. 1, 1, 1, 1 witness testimony of the first instance court, and 2, the Plaintiff’s pre-sale of the Plaintiff’s pre-sale account under the name of G.