임대차보증금반환
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The Plaintiff asserted that, on September 1, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on the premise that, under the name of Pyeongtaek-si D, 600 square meters and 15 million won on the second floor above ground, the lease deposit was paid at the city. On December 1, 2010, the Plaintiff agreed to extend the above building on the third floor, and the Defendant decided to return the extended construction cost at the time of termination of the contract instead of the Plaintiff’s payment of construction cost 100 million won. On October 30, 2016, the Plaintiff agreed to the said lease agreement and agreed to return 100 million won on the extension of construction cost by February 28, 2017.
2. The descriptions of the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 are insufficient to recognize the above, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.
3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.