2. The costs of appeal shall include the part resulting from the participation.

▣ 4쪽 17행부터 18행까지의 “임대보증금 5,000만 원 중 계약금 500만 원을 제외한 나머지 4,500만 원을 지급하지 못하고 있었고,” 부분을 “임대보증금 5,000만 원 중 3,200만 원을 지급하지 못하고 있었고,”로 고친다.

2. The reasoning for this part of the judgment on the plaintiff's insurance claim is as follows, and the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (from 7th to 10th 4th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth

▣ 제1심 판결서 이유 중 8쪽 1행부터 4행까지를 아래와 같이 고친다.

“(1) The Plaintiff, at the time, did not pay KRW 32 million out of the deposit for lease. Public charges, such as urban gas charges and sewerage charges for the instant bath were in a state of defluence for not less than two months. The Plaintiff purchased the instant insurance policy, which was based on KRW 2070,000 for a lump-sum payment of insurance premium or KRW 500,000 for monthly insurance premium, even though there was no other income, such as income tax return and failure to pay. In this regard, the Plaintiff subscribed to the instant insurance policy, which was based on the Special Act on the Safety Control of

(2) The Defendants asserted that each of the instant insurance contracts had to be concluded with the Defendants pursuant to Article 13-2. As the Act was amended by Act No. 11336 on February 22, 2012, Article 13-2, the Act on the Establishment of Multi-Use Establishments requires the owner of publicly-used businesses to subscribe to liability insurance, which imposes liability on the victims to pay the amount of money prescribed by Presidential Decree in cases where a fire in the publicly-used establishment causes death or injury to another person or property damage (Article 13-2(1)).