beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.01.11 2016고단3630

마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B imprisonment of 3 months, and Defendant C of 6 months, respectively.

(b).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant B and C were sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months, and Defendant C was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and the judgment on October 7, 2016 became final and conclusive on June 29, 2016.

[2016 Highest 3614]

1. Although Defendant C is not a narcotics handler, the Defendant performed an act of medication of the Metropha (the clopon, the copon, the copon, the copon, and the copon (the copon, the copon) as follows.

A. On December 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) opened the Defendant’s residence located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G in a scambling place; and (b) opened the bottom of the scopon in a scopon and administered the scopon using the inhaled tool.

B. On January 2016, the Defendant administered philophones in the above Defendant’s residence, and administered philophones in the above manner.

[2016 Highest 3630]

2. The sole criminal conduct of Defendant A;

A. On October 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) laid down two lids from his residence behind the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “H Elementary School” behind the “IFA”); (b) laid down two lids from each inner hole of each inner hole, sticking two lids rapidly; (c) laid down one spons with a spons with a spons with a spons with a spons with a spons with a spons; and (d) injected a spons with a spons with a spons with a sponsed spons by using the other spons with a spons.

B. From October 4, 2015 to the following day, the Defendant administered an insular phone in the same manner as that of the above paragraph (a) at the same place as the above paragraph.

(c)

On November 7, 2015, at the same place as the above paragraph (a), the Defendant administered an insularphone in the same manner as the above paragraph (a).

(d)

From January 30, 2016 to the following day, the Defendant administered a sponphone in the same manner as the above paragraph (a) at the same place as the above paragraph.

(e).