However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2019. 4. 8. 00:33경 경기 양주시 B에 있는 ‘C’ 업소에서 술에 취하여 다른 손님들에게 행패를 부리고, 이에 112 신고를 받고 출동한 양주경찰서 D지구대 소속 순경 E, 경사 F이 바닥에 누워있던 피고인을 일으키려고 하자, “썅년아”라고 욕설을 하며 양발로 순경 E의 허벅지를 수회 차고, 피고인을 현행범인 체포하려고 피고인에게 수갑을 채우려는 경사 F에게 “개새끼” 등 욕설을 하며 발로 위 경사 F의 이마를 1회 찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act: The degree of assault against police officers, etc. is not easy, and the latter is a first offender, etc.;